Activists Promote "Anti-Maryfer Centeno" Law: What Does This Proposal Entail?
The debate surrounding graphologist Maryfer Centeno has sparked a discussion on the admissibility of graphology in legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving abuse and child support.
Diana Luz Vázquez, an advocate and author, has joined the chorus calling for legislation that would exclude graphology from legal cases. In an interview, Vázquez expressed concerns over Centeno's role in the revictimization of women, especially those affiliated with the Ley Sabina collective.
Vázquez argues that the use of graphology as an instrument in legal proceedings can be detrimental, especially for women seeking justice in cases of sexual abuse and child support claims.
The activist stressed the need for legislative reform to bar the use of graphology in legal processes. She criticized Centeno's involvement in cases involving vulnerable women.
Maryfer Centeno, after facing a highly scrutinized press conference, has retreated from social media. The graphologist has been the target of criticism from both the public and prominent figures, including Sergio Mayer.
Mayer has accused Centeno's legal team of committing irregularities in the legal process. According to the Infobae portal, Centeno's case will have its initial hearing on January 13, 2025, a date change that has drawn criticism.
Mr. Doctor has expressed concerns over alleged irregularities in the proceedings, suggesting that the date change may have favored Centeno.